Thursday, May 24, 2007

The return to mainframe computing?

Network World

Wide Area Networking




Network World's Wide Area Networking Newsletter, 05/24/07

The return to mainframe computing?

By Steve Taylor and Jim Metzler

Jim recently moderated a seminar series on the topic of network and application optimization that was produced by Network World. This is the second of three newsletters that will discuss some of the questions that the audience had for the vendors that presented that the seminars.

Jim was surprised that one of the issues raised by the audience in each city was the return to the mainframe. For example, one attendee asked, “Isn’t the long term direction to move back to mainframe computing thereby eliminating WAN issues and most of us?” Another asked, “Would you say that with the implementation of VMware and virtualized data centers that we are going back to the days when we had only a mainframe?”

These questions seem to imply that we somehow have stopped using mainframes. The reality is that while mainframes are not as prevalent as they once were, we never stopped using mainframes. Many industries such as banking rely heavily today on mainframe computers.

Get the latest thinking on the core issues reshaping the new data center.

Download our new Executive Guide "Data Center Decisions" to sharpen your competitive edge. The comprehensive range of topics includes: Data Center Trends, User Case Studies, Heat/Power issues and key products for the data center.

Click to Download

That being said, there are indeed strong parallels between the IBM mainframes of the 1970s and 1980s and today’s virtualized data centers. In particular, the IBM mainframes of 20 years ago had powerful operating systems that supported virtualized processing and virtualized storage over the computer’s backplane. Given that architecture, it is reasonable to compare an IBM mainframe of that period with a contemporary data center that supports virtualized storage and processing over high-speed LANs and storage-area networks.

However, the phrase mainframe computing implies more than just the existence of a mainframe. That phrase also implies the type of desktop device and the types of applications that are run and the WAN connectivity. In the 1970s mainframe computing model the desktop device was a relatively dumb 3270 terminal. These terminals processed a standard set of applications that required virtually no bandwidth. In particular, the typical WAN of that timeframe was a 9600 baud, multi-point private line. Put another way, nobody ever sent a 10MB PowerPoint presentation over one of these networks.

In the current era of mainframe (or virtualized data center) computing, the desktop device can be a desktop computer, a laptop, or a wide range of PDAs or smart phones. These devices process a huge range of applications, some of which are provided by the company, and some of which are not. The WAN throughput requirements of these applications range from miniscule to monumental. The WAN itself is a combination of wired and wireless connectivity at speeds that typically range from sub-T-1 to OC-12. The movement to a service-oriented architecture with Web services drives one more distinction between 1970s mainframe computing and today’s mainframe computing. In the 1970s version of mainframe computing, the entire application resided on a single mainframe. In an SOA model, the application is comprised of multiple Web services that typically reside in different data centers.

The bottom line is that while it is possible to create an argument that we are returning to mainframe computers, it is tougher to make the argument that we are returning to traditional mainframe computing.


  What do you think?
Post a comment on this newsletter

TODAY'S MOST-READ STORIES:

1. A cynic rips open source
2. IT jargon you just love to hate
3. Top 15 controversial Microsoft quotes
4. Cisco routers cause major outage in Japan
5. Foundry readies monster Ethernet switch
6. Alltel agrees to $27.5B buyout
7. Why Argonne has pulled the plug on VoIP
8. Slideshow: Foundry's biggest Ethernet switch
9. DoD software protection comes to commercial sector
10. Microsoft won't sue over Linux - yet

MOST-READ REVIEW:
Midtier management tools register high marks


Contact the author:

Steve Taylor is president of Distributed Networking Associates and publisher/editor-in-chief of Webtorials. For more detailed information on most of the topics discussed in this newsletter, connect to Webtorials, the premier site for Web-based educational presentations, white papers, and market research. Taylor can be reached at taylor@webtorials.com

Jim Metzler is the Vice President of Ashton, Metzler & Associates, a consulting organization that focuses on leveraging technology for business success. Jim assists vendors to refine product strategies, service providers to deploy technologies and services, and enterprises evolve their network infrastructure. He can be reached via e-mail.



ARCHIVE

Archive of the Wide Area Networking Newsletter.


BONUS FEATURE

IT PRODUCT RESEARCH AT YOUR FINGERTIPS

Get detailed information on thousands of products, conduct side-by-side comparisons and read product test and review results with Network World’s IT Buyer’s Guides. Find the best solution faster than ever with over 100 distinct categories across the security, storage, management, wireless, infrastructure and convergence markets. Click here for details.


PRINT SUBSCRIPTIONS AVAILABLE
You've got the technology snapshot of your choice delivered to your inbox each day. Extend your knowledge with a print subscription to the Network World newsweekly, Apply here today.

International subscribers, click here.


SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES

To subscribe or unsubscribe to any Network World newsletter, change your e-mail address or contact us, click here.

This message was sent to: networking.world@gmail.com. Please use this address when modifying your subscription.


Advertising information: Write to Associate Publisher Online Susan Cardoza

Network World, Inc., 118 Turnpike Road, Southborough, MA 01772

Copyright Network World, Inc., 2007

No comments: