 ServersThis newsletter is sponsored by Mellanox TechnologiesNetwork World's Servers Newsletter, 06/26/07How National Association of Home Builders moved beyond VMware, Part 1By Jennifer MearsA few weeks ago, I began a series that puts the spotlight on enterprise users who are virtualizing x86 servers, but with technology other than VMware. There is no denying that VMware remains the dominant force in the x86 virtualization market, but this really is the year when alternatives to VMware will start getting more attention. Probably not surprisingly, all the enterprise IT executives I spoke with began with VMware, and many still run it in some capacity, but they’re all now moving beyond VMware technology to try competing approaches. Check out the Q&A I did with a user of the open source Xen hypervisor here. This week my focus is on SWsoft. Initially, SWsoft focused on hosting service providers, but in recent years it has been putting more focus on Virtuozzo, its enterprise product. SWsoft takes a different approach to virtualization than its competitors. Similar to Sun’s Solaris Containers, SWsoft virtualizes above the operating system so that multiple instances of an operating system can run on top of a single installed version.
VMware, Virtual Iron, Xen and Microsoft, on the other hand, enable multiple different operating systems to co-exist on a single physical server. Earlier this year, I spoke with John Yanekian, director of network services at the National Association of Home Builders in Washington, D.C. The NAHB started with VMware early on, but about a year and a half ago it started running SWsoft in production. What follows is an edited transcript of my conversation with Yanekian. I’ll continue the Q&A in Part 2 on Thursday. Mears: Why did you decide to virtualize your x86 systems initially? Yanekian: Our server room was getting crowded with too many Microsoft servers that were very underutilized. We just kept adding server after server. We were running out of KVM ports. We were running out of power plugs. We were running out of server racks. We said, ‘This is not going to work. We need to virtualize.’ We brought in VMware, but it was just basically test and development. Mears: Why did you start looking at SWsoft? Yanekian: We wanted to expand our virtualization project and we looked at Microsoft Virtual Server, but the performance was unacceptable [for production]. At the same time, I had gotten an invitation and attended an SWsoft seminar and that prompted me to test their software. I’m not going to say we had a problem with VMware performance, but Virtuozzo was better in everything. Virtuozzo has the good and the bad and VMware has the good and the bad. With VMware, each environment can have a different OS, but that adds up to licensing costs. With SWsoft and Virtuozzo you have one OS level, but you don’t have to get an OS license for every virtual server you bring up. Plus the cost of the product itself was a factor in our decision. In the long run, the more virtual servers we have the more money we save in OS licensing and then just the cost savings on the Virtuozzo product itself [vs. VMware]. It paid itself off very fast. Mears: What was the process of bringing in Virtuozzo? Have you pretty much standardized on it? Yanekian: Yes. We have three servers running virtual servers. Two are production and one is a testing ground. What we do is we bring a test server up and we test the product to see if it’s compatible and everything is working, that the virtualization of the OS is not adding any hiccups to the application we’re running. As soon as we get that going, we just move it to the production box. It’s a very simple process. You just click on the OS on the virtual server and then move it to this node. Two minutes later your server is running somewhere else. Mears: What did you start virtualizing in production first? Yanekian: We have a gamut of stuff. We have some Web servers running. We have a couple of accounting packages. We have a video production division and they need a server to host their Filemaker Pro database and they wanted it immediately. So I just made a virtual server and said if we see any performance impact we’ll buy dedicated hardware for it. It’s been six months or more now and they didn’t even complain. They don’t realize there are eight different applications running on the same hardware. Mears: When you move to virtualization it is kind of hard to get the entire organization to buy in, since they’re used to having dedicated hardware? Yanekian: Yes, now in our environment, they say we want to do this and this and this, what do we need? And we say, ‘OK, we’ll give you a server.’ They don’t care if they have their own hardware server as long as they have a server name and their application is running. If there were any negative impacts we’d move applications to a hardware node. But nobody has complained. Mears: Are all your applications now virtualized on Virtuozzo? Yanekian: No. Major stuff like Exchange and Citrix are not.
|
| Contact the author: Jennifer Mears is a freelance journalist based in Arizona. She was previously senior editor at Network World focusing on server issues. E-mail her at jlmears@gmail.com.
This newsletter is sponsored by Mellanox TechnologiesARCHIVEArchive of the Servers Newsletter. BONUS FEATUREIT PRODUCT RESEARCH AT YOUR FINGERTIPS Get detailed information on thousands of products, conduct side-by-side comparisons and read product test and review results with Network World’s IT Buyer’s Guides. Find the best solution faster than ever with over 100 distinct categories across the security, storage, management, wireless, infrastructure and convergence markets. Click here for details. PRINT SUBSCRIPTIONS AVAILABLE International subscribers, click here. SUBSCRIPTION SERVICESTo subscribe or unsubscribe to any Network World newsletter, change your e-mail address or contact us, click here. This message was sent to: networking.world@gmail.com. Please use this address when modifying your subscription. Advertising information: Write to Associate Publisher Online Susan Cardoza Network World, Inc., 118 Turnpike Road, Southborough, MA 01772 Copyright Network World, Inc., 2007 |
No comments:
Post a Comment